Karaoguz, M. Et Al. 2005. Is cytogenetic diagnosis of 46,XX karyotype spontaneous abortion specimens erroneous? Fluorescence in situ hybridization as a confirmatory technique. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH , vol.31, no.6 , 508-513.

Karaoguz, M., Nas, T., Konac, E., Ince, D., Pala, E., & Menevse, S., (2005). Is cytogenetic diagnosis of 46,XX karyotype spontaneous abortion specimens erroneous? Fluorescence in situ hybridization as a confirmatory technique. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH , vol.31, no.6, 508-513.

Karaoguz, MERAL Et Al. "Is cytogenetic diagnosis of 46,XX karyotype spontaneous abortion specimens erroneous? Fluorescence in situ hybridization as a confirmatory technique," JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH , vol.31, no.6, 508-513, 2005

Karaoguz, MERAL Y. Et Al. "Is cytogenetic diagnosis of 46,XX karyotype spontaneous abortion specimens erroneous? Fluorescence in situ hybridization as a confirmatory technique." JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH , vol.31, no.6, pp.508-513, 2005

Karaoguz, M. Et Al. (2005) . "Is cytogenetic diagnosis of 46,XX karyotype spontaneous abortion specimens erroneous? Fluorescence in situ hybridization as a confirmatory technique." JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH , vol.31, no.6, pp.508-513.

@article{article, author={MERAL YİRMİBEŞ KARAOĞUZ Et Al. }, title={Is cytogenetic diagnosis of 46,XX karyotype spontaneous abortion specimens erroneous? Fluorescence in situ hybridization as a confirmatory technique}, journal={JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH}, year=2005, pages={508-513} }