Does the horizontal condylar angle have a relationship to temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis and condylar position? A cone-beam computed tomography study

Pamukçu U., Tetik H., Peker İ., Altunkaynak B., Zafersoy Akarslan Z.

FOLIA MORPHOLOGICA, cilt.81, sa.3, ss.723-731, 2022 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 81 Sayı: 3
  • Basım Tarihi: 2022
  • Doi Numarası: 10.5603/fm.a2021.0075
  • Dergi Adı: FOLIA MORPHOLOGICA
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, BIOSIS, CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.723-731
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: &nbsp, horizontal condylar angle, temporomandibular joint, osteoarthritis, condylar position, cone -beam computed tomography, SPLIT RAMUS OSTEOTOMY, MANDIBULAR CONDYLE, INTERNAL DERANGEMENT, MORPHOLOGY, SUBMENTOVERTEX, RELIABILITY, ASSOCIATION, DISORDERS, FOSSA
  • Gazi Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Background: The aim of the study was to evaluate the relationship between the and condylar position on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. Materials and methods: Based on TMJ OA, joints were classified as affected and the unaffected. According to the OA condition of their joints, three groups of patients were formed: control group (n = 159, 41.1%), unilateral group (n = 121, 31.3%), and bilateral group (n = 107, 27.6%). In total, the HCAs of 774 TMJs of 387 patients were measured and their condylar positions were determined as concentric (n = 184, 23.8%), posterior (n = 338, 43.7%), and anterior (n = 252, 32.5%). Results: The mean HCA of the bilateral group (22.7 +/- 7.6 degrees) was greater than those in both the control (19.5 +/- 6.4 degrees) and the unilateral (20.5 +/- 6.5 degrees) groups (p < 0.05). However, the difference was not statistically significant between the control and unilateral group (p > 0.05). In total patients, unlike the unilateral group, the affected joints had a greater mean HCA than the unaffected joints (p < 0.05). The mean HCAs of the joints according to the condylar position were as concentric: 20.6 +/- 6.7 degrees, posterior: 21.1 +/- 7.8 degrees, and anterior: 20.2 +/- 7.9 degrees (p > 0.05). Conclusions: While the HCA increased in the presence of TMJ OA, no relationship was found between HCA and three different condylar positions. (Folia Morphol 2022; 81, 3: 723-731)