Interpretation of possible biogas production capacity by investigating the effects of anaerobic digester tank geometry and angular velocity on flow characteristics


YALÇIN ÇELİK A., Elibol E. A., TURGUT O., Senol H., Sillanpää M.

Environmental Science and Pollution Research, cilt.31, sa.50, ss.60220-60234, 2024 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 31 Sayı: 50
  • Basım Tarihi: 2024
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1007/s11356-024-35205-6
  • Dergi Adı: Environmental Science and Pollution Research
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, IBZ Online, ABI/INFORM, Aerospace Database, Agricultural & Environmental Science Database, Aqualine, Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA), BIOSIS, CAB Abstracts, EMBASE, Environment Index, Geobase, MEDLINE, Pollution Abstracts, Veterinary Science Database, Civil Engineering Abstracts
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.60220-60234
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: Anaerobic digestion, CFD, Mechanical stirring, Methane, Renewable energy, Stirred-tank reactor
  • Gazi Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Mixing performance in reactors producing biogas through anaerobic digestion is one of the parameters that directly affect biogas yield. The most commonly used mixing model for bioreactors in biogas-production processes is mechanical mixing. In the present study, we focus on the geometry of the tank, where the mechanical mixing actually takes place. In this context, by using the six-blade standard Rushton impeller in two different types of tank, flow patterns involving velocity, dead zone volume, turbulent kinetic energy, and turbulent eddy dissipation rate in the angular velocity range of 25–100 rpm were observed, and the possible effects of the results on biogas production were interpreted. A new impeller design was proposed that maximizes the interface between the fluid inside the reactor tank and the impeller, which has the potential to reduce the dead zone volume to significantly lower levels. Our results showed that the lowest dead zone volume was achieved for a 60° slope reactor tank compared to the conventional 90° slope reactor tank at an angular velocity of 100 rpm. The dead zone volume decreased to 0.000094 m3 at 100 rpm in the 60° slope reactor tank with a total volume of 0.0305 m3, which by comparison was 0.000374 m3 in the 90° slope reactor tank. The magnitudes of both maximum turbulent kinetic energy and maximum turbulent eddy dissipation were higher in the 60° slope reactor tank at all angular velocities examined, which would be expected to enhance mixing performance. It is hoped that the reader will benefit from the results of this study; however, further studies should be conducted on the use of actual biowaste as the working fluid instead of water.