Bacterial and fungal communities in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps


Creative Commons License

Uzunoğlu E., KALKANCI A., KILIÇ E., KIZIL Y., AYDİL U., Diker K. S., ...Daha Fazla

PLoS ONE, cilt.19, sa.5 May, 2024 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 19 Sayı: 5 May
  • Basım Tarihi: 2024
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304634
  • Dergi Adı: PLoS ONE
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, Academic Search Premier, Agricultural & Environmental Science Database, Animal Behavior Abstracts, Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA), BIOSIS, Biotechnology Research Abstracts, Chemical Abstracts Core, Food Science & Technology Abstracts, Index Islamicus, Linguistic Bibliography, MEDLINE, Pollution Abstracts, Psycinfo, zbMATH, Directory of Open Access Journals
  • Gazi Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Objective Multiple inflammatory mechanisms dynamically interact in the development of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). Disruption of the relationship between host and environmental factors on the mucosal surface leads to the development of inflammation. Microorganisms constitute the most important part of environmental factors. Methods 28 volunteers (18 CRSwNP patients and 10 healthy individuals) were included in the study. Eight patients were recurrent nasal polyposis cases, and the remaining were primary cases. Swab samples were taken from the middle meatus under endoscopic examination from all participants. After DNA extraction, a library was created with the Swift Amplicon 16S + ITS kit and sequenced with Illumina Miseq. Sequence analysis was performed using QIIME, UNITE v8.2 database for ITS and Silva v138 for 16S rRNA. Results The predominant bacteria in all groups were Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria as phyla and Staphylococcus, Corynebacterium, Sphingomonas as genera. Comparison of bacterial communities of CRSwNP patients and control group highlighted Corynebacterium, as the differentiating taxa for control group and Streptococcus, Moraxella, Rothia, Micrococcus, Gemella, and Prevotella for CRSwNP patients. The predominant fungal genus in all groups was Malassezia. Staphylococcus; showed a statistically significant negative correlation with Dolosigranulum. Corynebacterium had a positive correlation with Anaerococcus, and a negative correlation with Neisseria, Prevotella, Fusobacterium and Peptostreptococcus. Conclusion Nasal microbiome of CRSwNP patients shows greater inter-individual variation than the control group. Corynebacterium is less abundant in patients with CRSwNP compared to the control group. Malassezia is the predominant fungus in the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses and correlates positively with the abundance of Corynebacterium.