The relationship of masseter muscle thickness with face morphology and parafunctional habits: an ultrasound study


İspir N. G., Toraman M.

DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, cilt.51, sa.8, 2022 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 51 Sayı: 8
  • Basım Tarihi: 2022
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1259/dmfr.20220166
  • Dergi Adı: DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, EMBASE
  • Gazi Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the normal range of masseter muscle thickness by ultrasonographic measurement in individuals over 15 years of age, and to eval-uate its relationship with age, gender, facial morphology, body mass index and parafunctional habits.Methods: The study was conducted on 115 volunteers whose lateral cephalometric radiog-raphy was performed within the indication in Gazi University Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. The participants in the study were asked questions about their parafunctional habits, age, height and weight. Individuals were grouped as hypodivergent (n = 28), normdivergent (n = 55), or hyperdivergent (n = 32) according to vertical face morphology by making measurements on lateral cephalometric films. Right and left masseter muscle thicknesses of individ-uals were measured by ultrasonography while at rest and in contraction.Results: The mean value of masseter muscle thickness was found to be 13.57 +/- 2.57 mm. The rest and contracted muscle thicknesses were significantly higher in males than in females for the right and left masseter muscles (p < 0.05). When the masseter muscle was at rest and contracted, its thickness was higher in individuals with hypodivergent facial morphology, than in the other groups. No statistically significant difference was found in terms of masseter muscle thickness between individuals having parafunctional habits and those who did not have parafunctional habits (p > 0.05).Conclusion: Although masseter muscle thickness varied according to vertical facial morphology, this was not the case for parafunctional habits.Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (2022) 51, 20220166. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20220166