Diagnostic and prognostic significance of image cytometric DNA ploidy measurement in cytological samples of cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions


Demirel D., Akyurek N., Ramzy I.

CYTOPATHOLOGY, cilt.24, sa.2, ss.105-112, 2013 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 24 Sayı: 2
  • Basım Tarihi: 2013
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1111/cyt.12039
  • Dergi Adı: CYTOPATHOLOGY
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.105-112
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: cervix, DNA image cytometry, ploidy, squamous intraepithelial lesion, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, HUMAN-PAPILLOMAVIRUS, INTEROBSERVER REPRODUCIBILITY, GRADE, PROGRESSION, CARCINOMA, SYSTEM, CANCER, SMEARS, TUMORS, CELLS
  • Gazi Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

D. Demirel, N. Akyurek and I. Ramzy Diagnostic and prognostic significance of image cytometric DNA ploidy measurement in cytological samples of cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions Objective: To study the DNA ploidy pattern of uterine cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions (SILs) and its diagnostic and prognostic significance. Methods: The study included 31 cases of SIL: 11 low-grade (LSIL) and 20 high-grade (HSIL). Feulgenpararosaniline staining was performed on previously Papanicolaou-stained smears and a DNA image cytometric study was performed. An internal reference was used to calibrate the samples. Results: All 31 cases of SIL, either LSIL or HSIL, were non-diploid. Of the 11 cases of LSIL, four were tetraploid and seven were aneuploid, whereas, of the 20 cases of HSIL, four were tetraploid and 16 were aneuploid. Stemline aneuploidy was not a significant discriminator between LSIL and HSIL (P=0.32). Based on single-cell analysis, HSIL cases had significantly higher DNA content than LSIL cases (P<0.01). When a mean of 30% or more was used for the 6c-exceeding event (6cEE) value, the sensitivity and specificity to indicate HSIL were 83% and 64%, respectively, with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 81% and negative predictive value (NPV) of 65%. All HSIL cases were cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2+) on biopsy. In addition, cases which showed recurrence had more DNA content by single-cell analysis than those with an indolent clinical behaviour: P=0.04 and P=0.03 for LSIL and HSIL, respectively. Conclusions: Image cytometric DNA analysis is a useful technique for diagnostic and prognostic purposes in uterine cervical SIL when appropriate c' values are used in single-cell analysis. We propose that a >6c DNA content of 30% is useful as a cut-off level for predicting cases with CIN2+ in DNA image cytometry of cervical smears.