Akademik Veri Yönetim Sistemi
Electronics (Switzerland), cilt.15, sa.8, 2026 (SCI-Expanded, Scopus)
Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems based on traditional Deep Learning (DL) are expected to play a leading role in the early detection of various diseases in healthcare applications. However, there are two major drawbacks of these systems: protecting patient privacy and obtaining sufficiently large, high-quality datasets to train reliable models. In traditional DL, collecting data from different sources on a single central server increases system complexity and raises serious privacy and security concerns. Federated Learning (FL) makes it possible to train models locally at multiple data locations while collaboratively improving a global model without exposing raw data, making it a promising architectural solution for privacy preservation. Although previous studies have reported that FL can achieve performance comparable to centralized DL approaches, traditional FL approaches often struggle to maintain consistent performance across different settings. This limitation becomes more noticeable when heterogeneous data distributions, modalities, and domains are involved. In these situations, client drift, overfitting, and generalization capability of the global model arise as major challenges. Thus, this study presents FedCycle as an incremental improvement of the FedAvg algorithm. It modifies the aggregation frequency. It aims to overcome these drawbacks and make the global model more stable and efficient. The FedCycle eliminates centralized data collection, enhances data security, and effectively reduces client drift and overfitting by supporting model training across heterogeneous data distributions, modalities, and domains. The performance evaluation involves extensive experiments using various real-world breast cancer image datasets, namely BREAKHIS, ROBOFLOW, RSNA, BUSI, and BCFPP. The presented method is evaluated against both traditional DL and FL approaches using accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and AUC. The findings confirm that applying fine-tuning within FedCycle reduces overfitting during training. As a result, FedCycle achieves performance improvements of 7.75% and 4.65% in accuracy and F1-score on the RSNA and BCFPP datasets compared to traditional DL approaches, while also providing an average improvement of approximately 1.5% in accuracy and F1-score across BREAKHIS, ROBOFLOW, and BUSI datasets compared to FedAvg.