Amyloidosis has been well known since Rudolph Virchow named the condition in the 19th century. Most physicians were aware of the association between amyloidosis to chronic suppurative conditions and multiple myeloma. However, familial Mediterranean fever, although probably as ancient as the Galenic era, was appropriately identified only in the 21st century. The nomenclature was variable throughout history, but the name “FMF” has been universally adopted since the report from Heller and colleagues in 1958. In 1967, Sokmen and Ozdemir of Ankara University published a report on 194 patients, of whom 64 had amyloidosis. Familial Mediterranean fever constituted the cause in half of the cases. Goldfinger and Ozkan demonstrated efficacy of colchicine for treatment of familial Mediterranean fever in 1972, and further studies revealed that colchicine is also efficient for prevention of amyloidosis. However, since then, several single-center and multicenter amyloid A amyloidosis studies from Turkey have been published. Almost invariably, familial Mediterranean fever is the most common cause of systemic amyloidosis. No downward trends in percentages have been observed. Recent studies have shown that cases of amyloidosis in patients with familial Mediterranean fever are decreasing. Also, cases of amyloidosis in conjunction with suppurative conditions are on the decrease worldwide. However, according to registry data from the Turkish Society of Nephrology, the percentage of incident hemodialysis patients with amyloidosis is not decreasing. The question arises: Why is a complication that is 98% preventable still causing end-stage renal disease? We believe the lack of a stable and comprehensive registry for familial Mediterranean fever, including associated cases of amyloidosis, is the reason we cannot properly answer this question. In this work, we use a historical approach to present why a familial Mediterranean fever registry is direly needed.