JOURNAL OF ADHESION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, cilt.30, sa.1, ss.45-55, 2016 (SCI-Expanded)
Aim: The aim of the study was to compare the shear bond strength of three different types of recycled brackets on porcelain facets following different surface treatments. Materials and Methods: Eighty-four porcelain facets were produced by duplication of the labial surface of a maxillary right first premolar. Each porcelain facet was individually embedded in autopolymerizing acrylic resin. A thin coat of sealant was also painted on the bracket base and cured for 15s before applying the paste. The bracket was then positioned on the porcelain facet, pressed lightly and light-cured. Each specimen was loaded into a universal testing machine using Nexjen software for testing, with the long axis of the specimen perpendicular to the direction of the applied force. Then, the brackets were rebonded following different surface treatments (Laser, hydrofluoric acid, sandblasting with Al2O3, and silane treatment). Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance and post hoc Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were performed to test the differences in shear bond strength values (p<0.05). The significance of differences in the ARI scores was analyzed with chi-square test (p<0.05). Results: Statistical analysis indicated significant differences among surface treatment procedures (p<0.0001). In addition, the effect of the first and second bonding factors on shear bond strength behaviors was shown to be significant for the brackets (p<0.001). Conclusion: The use of sandblasting, HF treatment and silanization procedure could be used for improving the rebond shear bond strength of zirconia brackets to porcelain surface. However, rebonding the brackets to porcelain surfaces may not be recommended due to the dramatic decrease in bonding values.