Diagnostic performance of FDG PET/MRI for cervical lymph node metastasis in patients with clinically N0 head and neck cancer


Cebeci S., Aydos U., Yeniceri A., Pula D., Düzlü M., Atay L. Ö., ...Daha Fazla

EUROPEAN REVIEW FOR MEDICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, cilt.27, sa.10, ss.4528-4535, 2023 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 27 Sayı: 10
  • Basım Tarihi: 2023
  • Doi Numarası: 10.26355/eurrev_202305_32459
  • Dergi Adı: EUROPEAN REVIEW FOR MEDICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Directory of Open Access Journals
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.4528-4535
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: Cancer of head and neck, Lymph nodes, Magnetic resonance imaging, Metastases, Positron emission tomography
  • Gazi Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

OBJECTIVE: Treatment manage-ment in cases of head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC) that are clinically negative for lymph node metastases (cN0) is still an import-ant topic of discussion. There is increasing in-terest in sensitive imaging modalities that can detect the risk of occult metastases at levels be-low 20%. This study aimed to examine the effica-cy of integrated positron emission tomography (PET)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in de-termining neck nodal metastasis status in cN0 patients with HNSCC.PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retro-spective study, 44 patients who underwent neck dissection with the diagnosis of HNSCC be-tween January 2018 and August 2020 were an-alyzed. Clinical examinations, including ultra-sonography, were performed to identify cervi-cal metastases in HNSCC patients with preoper-ative cN0. A nuclear medicine specialist visual-ly evaluated the MRI, PET, and PET/MRI results.RESULTS: Histopathologically, 86.4% of pa-tients were classified as N0. According to the his-topathological results, MRI showed 50% sensitiv-ity, 89.5% specificity, 91.8% negative predictive value (NPV), 42.8% positive predictive value (PPV) and 84% accuracy, while PET showed 83.3% sen-sitivity, 68.4% specificity, 96.2% NPV, 29.4% PPV and 70.4% accuracy. PET/MRI was more success-ful in distinguishing pathological N0 and N+ pa-tients (83.3% sensitivity, 92.1% specificity, 97.2% NPV, 62.5% PPV and 90.9% accuracy).CONCLUSIONS: PET/MRI is more sensitive and has a higher NPV compared to MRI alone, while its sensitivity was found to be compara-ble to that of PET. In addition, with its ability to detect pathological N0 patients, PET/MRI may significantly decrease the number of unneces-sary neck dissections.