Urbanism. Architecture. Constructions, cilt.14, sa.3, ss.263-280, 2023 (ESCI)
The aim of this paper is to discuss the radical shift which emerges
in the 1990s and enhances architecture in the 2000s by turning it into a less
sculptural more intellectual field of design. Hence, architects rather focus
on ground than figure in design projects. This leads them to interrogate the
conventional relationships between figure and ground enabling figure to
dominate the ground in architecture for decades. They discover the mutual
relationships between figure and ground, and design grounded structures
instead of ungrounded sculptures. These artificial structures seem like the
extensions of the natural landscape, as such the conceptual and categorical
distinction between artificial and natural blurs in architecture. Another
conceptual blurring emerges between the concepts of landscape, ground,
and field. These are generally used as interchangeable concepts, but
landscape encompasses ground and field, making it a more comprehensive
concept for architects. It is revealed in the paper that landscape is a reemerging concept which refers to the conceptual shift from form and
function to flow and force in architecture. Landscape, therefore, awaits to
be explored as a field of flows and forces by even more architects in this
century in which cities are characterized by sculptural forms and objects.