Akademik Veri Yönetim Sistemi
ELECTRONICS (Basel), cilt.15, sa.7, ss.1383-1407, 2026 (SCI-Expanded, Scopus)
This paper presents a systematic experimental comparison of three sliding-mode-based current control strategies—traditional sliding mode control (SMC), fast terminal sliding mode control (FTSMC), and super-twisting sliding mode control (STSMC)—applied to a grid-connected five-level active neutral point clamped flying capacitor (5L-ANPC-FC) inverter. Unlike existing studies that typically investigate a single controller or topology, this work provides a fair, hardware-validated benchmark under identical operating conditions, enabling a clear assessment of convergence speed, harmonic performance, robustness, and implementation complexity. All controllers are designed within a unified framework and their stability is rigorously analyzed using Lyapunov theory. Experimental evaluations are conducted under steady-state operation, step changes in reference current, grid-voltage sag/swell, and DC-link voltage variations. The results demonstrate that while all three controllers ensure robust current tracking and inherent DC-side capacitor voltage balancing without additional control loops, FTSMC achieves the lowest grid-current total harmonic distortion (THD) and fastest convergence. STSMC effectively suppresses chattering, and traditional SMC offers a simple yet reliable baseline solution. The presented findings provide practical design guidelines for selecting appropriate sliding-mode controllers in high-performance multilevel inverter applications. Among the assessed control techniques, FTSMC has the most rapid dynamic response, characterized by a rise time of 0.1 ms and a minimal grid-current THD of 1.95%, indicating exceptional steady-state and transient performance. STSMC markedly diminishes chattering and ripple, attaining a THD of 2.04% with enhanced waveform smoothness relative to traditional SMC. Conversely, traditional SMC offers a more straightforward implementation but demonstrates elevated ripple and THD levels of around 2.29%, along with a peak current inaccuracy of 6–8%. The results underscore the trade-offs between implementation simplicity, dynamic responsiveness, and harmonic performance of the evaluated control techniques.