Biomechanical impact of anterior cantilever length on subperiosteal implants with different materials and configurations


BEDİRHANDEDE B., GÜNEY B., Doğan D. G., TÜRK B. E.

Journal of Prosthodontics, 2026 (SCI-Expanded, Scopus)

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Basım Tarihi: 2026
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1111/jopr.70247
  • Dergi Adı: Journal of Prosthodontics
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Natural Science Collection (ProQuest), Biological Science Database (ProQuest), Biomedical Reference Collection: Corporate Edition (EBSCO), Health Research Premium Collection (ProQuest)
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: cantilever length, Cfr-PEEK, finite element analysis, subperiosteal implant, titanium
  • Gazi Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of anterior cantilever length on stress distribution in subperiosteal implants (SI) fabricated from titanium and 60% carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone (PEEK) with one-piece and two-piece configurations using finite element analysis. Materials and Methods: Sixteen three-dimensional finite element models of an atrophic maxilla were constructed, incorporating one-piece and two-piece SI designs fabricated from titanium and 60% carbon fiber-reinforced PEEK with anterior cantilever lengths of 0, 2, 4, and 6 mm. All materials were assumed isotropic, homogeneous, and linearly elastic. A 100 N oblique load at 45° was applied to the palatal region of the maxillary anterior teeth in a labio-apical direction to simulate anterior functional loading. Maximum principal stress, minimum principal stress, and von Mises stress were evaluated in the supporting bone, implant body, fixation screws, and prosthetic bar. Results: Maximum and minimum principal stress values in the supporting bone progressively increased with cantilever length, with minimal material-related differences. Fixation screw von Mises stress values increased with cantilever length and were consistently higher in one-piece than in two-piece designs. Prosthetic bar von Mises stress values peaked at 2 mm. Subperiosteal implant von Mises stress values increased with cantilever length and were substantially higher in two-piece designs than in one-piece designs. Conclusions: Anterior cantilever length influences stress distribution in subperiosteal implant-supported prostheses, with stress magnitudes increasing proportionally to cantilever extension regardless of material or configuration.