The role of lung ultrasound and ultrasound elastography in diagnosis of interstitial lung diseases


Creative Commons License

ACHIKGOZ Z., AYDOĞDU M., Ozturk E., Yılmaz Demirci N., turktas h., Kokturk N.

Tüberküloz ve Toraks, cilt.72, sa.2, ss.95-106, 2024 (ESCI) identifier identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 72 Sayı: 2
  • Basım Tarihi: 2024
  • Doi Numarası: 10.5578/tt.202402873
  • Dergi Adı: Tüberküloz ve Toraks
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI), Scopus, CAB Abstracts, TR DİZİN (ULAKBİM)
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.95-106
  • Gazi Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

The role of lung ultrasound and ultrasound elastography in diagnosis of interstitial lung diseases Introduction: Ultrasound elastography (US-E) is a novel, tissue stiffness-sensi- tive imaging method. We aimed to investigate whether lung ultrasound (US) and US-E can play a role in diagnosing interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) in which lung elasticity is affected due to fibrosis. Materials and Methods: A prospective cohort study. Patients with ILD were defined as ‘‘ILD group’’ and with other pulmonary diseases as ‘‘control group”. All subjects were examined and compared by lung US in B and elastography modes. Besides, the relationship between ultrasonography and high-resolution computerized tomography (HRCT) and chest X-ray findings was evaluated. Results: A total of 109 patients, 55 in ILD and 54 in the control group, with a mean age of 62 ± 14 years, were included. A positive correlation was found between the Warrick score (calculated from HRCT to determine the severity of ILD) and the number of B-lines (discrete vertical reverberation artifacts, indicating interstitial lung syndrome) in lung US (p= 0.001, r= 0.550) in the ILD group. In US-E, blue color (meaning more rigid tissue) dominated in the ILD group, and green color (indicating medium tissue stiffness) dominated in the control group (p= 0.001). Lung US diagnosed the ILD with 69% accuracy, 80% sensitivity, and 60% specificity compared to HRCT. Combined with chest X-ray, diagnostic accuracy was 74%, sensitivity 60%, and specificity 89%. Conclusion: Although lung US and US-E are not superior to gold standard HRCT in diagnosing ILDs, they can still be accepted as promising, novel, non- invasive tools, especially when combined with chest X-rays. Their role still needs to be clarified with further studies.