Development and validation of an in vitro-in vivo correlation for buspirone hydrochloride extended release tablets


Takka S., Sakr A., Goldberg A.

JOURNAL OF CONTROLLED RELEASE, cilt.88, sa.1, ss.147-157, 2003 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 88 Sayı: 1
  • Basım Tarihi: 2003
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1016/s0168-3659(02)00490-x
  • Dergi Adı: JOURNAL OF CONTROLLED RELEASE
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.147-157
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: buspirone hydrochloride, in-vitro-in-vivo correlation, extended release tablet, METOPROLOL TARTRATE, CORRELATION IVIVC, LEVEL-A, FORMULATION, PHARMACOKINETICS
  • Gazi Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

The aim of this study was to develop an in-vitro-in-vivo correlation (IVIVC) for two buspirone hydrochloride extended release formulations and to compare their plasma concentrations over time with the commercially available immediate release (IR) tablets. In vitro release rate data were obtained for each formulation using the USP Apparatus 2, paddle stirrer at 50 and 100 rpm in 0.1 M HCl and pH 6.8 phosphate buffer. A three-way crossover study in 18 healthy subjects studied a 30 mg "Fast" (12 h) and 30 mg "Slow" (24 h) formulation of buspirone hydrochloride given once a day, and 2x15 mg immediate release tablets dosed at a 12 h interval. The similarity factor (f(2)) was used to analyze the dissolution data. A linear correlation model was developed using percent absorbed data and percent dissolved data from the two formulations. Predicted buspirone hydrochloride concentrations were obtained by use of a curve fitting equation for the immediate release data to determine the volume of distribution and fraction absorbed constants. Prediction errors were estimated for C-max and area under the curve (AUC) to determine the validity of the correlation. pH 6.8 at 50 rpm was found to be the most discriminating dissolution method. Linear regression analyses of the mean percentage of dose absorbed versus the mean in vitro release resulted in a significant correlation (r(2) > 0.95) for the two formulations. An average percent prediction error for C-max was -0.16%, but was 16.1%, for the AUCs of the two formulations. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.