SMILE for the Treatment of Residual Refractive Error After Cataract Surgery
OPHTHALMOLOGY AND THERAPY, cilt.11, ss.1539-1550, 2022 (SCI-Expanded, Scopus)
- Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
- Cilt numarası: 11
- Basım Tarihi: 2022
- Doi Numarası: 10.1007/s40123-022-00526-7
- Dergi Adı: OPHTHALMOLOGY AND THERAPY
- Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, Academic Search Premier, EMBASE, Directory of Open Access Journals
- Sayfa Sayıları: ss.1539-1550
- Anahtar Kelimeler: IOL, Pseudophakia, Refractive error, SMILE surgery, Trifocal, VisuMax, TRIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR-LENS, VISUAL QUALITY, EXCHANGE, IMPLANTATION, IOL, DISSATISFACTION, SATISFACTION, PERFORMANCE, ASTIGMATISM, HYPEROPIA
- Açık Arşiv Koleksiyonu: AVESİS Açık Erişim Koleksiyonu
- Gazi Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet
Özet
Introduction In the context of managing patients' expectations and satisfaction regarding visual acuity after cataract surgery, we aimed to investigate the improvement in visual acuity and patient satisfaction after small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) in pseudophakic (trifocal intraocular lens, IOL) patients with residual myopic refraction after cataract surgery. Methods Seventy-six patients (82 eyes) who underwent cataract surgery with ZEISS AT LISA tri 839MP IOL implantation were included in this retrospective study. The included patients were 56-79 years old, wanted spectacle independence, and had preoperative myopic refraction between - 1.0 and - 2.25 diopters (D) and astigmatism between - 0.75 and - 1.75 D. The treatment status of these patients was defined as trifocal IOL (n = 82). SMILE was performed in patients who were dissatisfied after cataract surgery, and these patients were followed up for 1 year on average. We evaluated visual acuity and satisfaction and further examined laser vision correction and satisfaction levels in patients who were dissatisfied after trifocal IOL implantation. Results The possible reasons for patient dissatisfaction were reading books, using a computer, and driving at night. After SMILE, the residual myopic refractive error (spherical) decreased significantly from - 2.08 +/- 0.28 [- 2.25 to - 1.0] preoperatively to - 0.25 +/- 0.20 - 0.5 to 0] 1 year postoperatively (p < 0.001). Additionally, the uncorrected distance visual acuity increased from 0.65 +/- 0.08 [0.52-0.7] logMAR preoperatively to 0.09 +/- 0.02 [0.05-0.1] logMAR at 1 month postoperatively (p < 0.001), 0.09 +/- 0.02 [0.05-0.1] logMAR at 6 months postoperatively, and 0.06 +/- 0.02 [0.05-0.1] logMAR at 12 months postoperatively (p < 0.001). Patient satisfaction measures after SMILE (reading, night driving, and using a computer) were significantly improved. Conclusion SMILE is a reliable method for treating residual refraction after cataract surgery, as it provides results in the shortest time without complications and increases patient satisfaction.