An Evaluation on the Transformation of the Relationship Between Form and Function in Architectural Discourse


Creative Commons License

Turhan S., Güleç G.

Istanbul International Modern Scientific Researches Conference-IX, İstanbul, Türkiye, 10 - 12 Nisan 2026, ss.484-498, (Tam Metin Bildiri)

  • Yayın Türü: Bildiri / Tam Metin Bildiri
  • Basıldığı Şehir: İstanbul
  • Basıldığı Ülke: Türkiye
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.484-498
  • Açık Arşiv Koleksiyonu: AVESİS Açık Erişim Koleksiyonu
  • Gazi Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

The emergence of Sullivan’s late 19th-century discourse, "Form follows function," established a

deterministic relationship between form and function within the field of architecture. However, various

architectural discourses have been developed to define and justify form, but this study discusses “Form

follows function” (Louis Sullivan, 1896), “Form follows fiasco” (Peter Blake, 1977), “Form follows

form” (Bernard Tschumi, 1996), “Function follows form” (Yona Friedman, 1997), and “Function and

form follow climate” (Philippe Rahm, 2021) to demonstrate how the relationship between form and

function has transformed in architectural history. As these discourses have shifted, the doctrine of "Form

follows function," a cornerstone of 20th-century modern architecture, has evolved in response to technological advancements, shifting environmental relations, economic crises, and climate crisis. As a

result of these changes, architectural design paradigms have undergone a fundamental transformation.

Consequently, the way architectural design engages with site, function, environment, and technology

has experienced a significant metamorphosis. Based on these observations, this study examines the

relationship between form and function, as reflected in architectural discourse and design. It indicates

that, in the 21st century, design is increasingly determined by an environment of aesthetic preferences

shaped by computers and the media. To articulate this phenomenon, the study proposes new discourses,

such as “Form follows media” and “Form follows artificial intelligence” asserting that architectural form

now follows digital environments. In the context of 21st-century architecture—characterized by rapid

digital evolution and diversified media tools—it becomes evident that form no longer follows the site

or function; instead, formal characteristics are determined by artificial intelligence, and designs polished

and highlighted by the media. Ultimately, the study demonstrates that the shifts in the relationship

between form and function are directly related to architecture’s engagement with the shifting values and

dynamics of the century.