Comparison of diagnostic performances of three different software packages in detecting coronary artery disease

Guner, Levent; KARABACAK, NEŞE; Cakir, Tansel; Akdemir, ÜMİT; Kocaman, Sinan; Cengel, Atiye; ÜNLÜ, MUSTAFA

doi:10.1007/s00259-010-1522-1

Comparison of diagnostic performances of three different software packages in detecting coronary artery disease

Atıf İçin Kopyala

Guner L. A., KARABACAK N., Cakir T., Akdemir O. U., Kocaman S. A., Cengel A., ...Daha Fazla

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, cilt.37, sa.11, ss.2070-2078, 2010 (SCI-Expanded)

Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
Cilt numarası: 37 Sayı: 11
Basım Tarihi: 2010
Doi Numarası: 10.1007/s00259-010-1522-1
Dergi Adı: EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING
Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus
Sayfa Sayıları: ss.2070-2078
Gazi Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Quantification of myocardial perfusion scintigraphy is frequently performed to assist physicians in detecting coronary artery disease (CAD). Software packages provide automated quantification of perfusion data. We aimed to compare the three commonly used software packages, Emory Cardiac Toolbox (ECT v2 and ECT v3), 4D-MSPECT (4DM v2 and 4DM v4) and Quantitative Perfusion SPECT (QPS v3 and QPS v4).