Single machine scheduling problem with interval processing times to minimize mean weighted completion time


Allahverdi A., Aydilek H., Aydilek A.

COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH, pp.200-207, 2014 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier

  • Publication Type: Article / Article
  • Publication Date: 2014
  • Doi Number: 10.1016/j.cor.2014.06.003
  • Journal Name: COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH
  • Journal Indexes: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus
  • Page Numbers: pp.200-207
  • Keywords: Heuristics, Mean completion time, Scheduling, Single machine, Uncertainty
  • Gazi University Affiliated: No

Abstract

The single resource scheduling problem is commonly applicable in practice not only when there is a single resource but also in some multiple-resource production systems where only one of the resources is bottle neck. Thus, the single resource (machine) scheduling problem has been widely addressed in the scheduling literature. In this paper, the single machine scheduling problem with uncertain and interval processing times is addressed. The objective is to minimize mean weighted completion time. The problem has been addressed in the literature and efficient heuristics have been presented. In this paper, some new polynomial time heuristics, utilizing the bounds of processing times, are proposed. The proposed and existing heuristics are compared by extensive computational experiments. The conducted experiments include a generalized simulation environment and several additional representative distributions in addition to the restricted experiments used in the literature. The results indicate that the proposed heuristics perform significantly better than the existing heuristics. Specifically, the best performing proposed heuristic reduces the error of the best existing heuristic in the literature by more than 75% while the computational time of the best performing proposed heuristic is less than that of the best existing heuristic. Moreover, the absolute error of the best performing heuristic is only about 1% of the optimal solution. Having a very small absolute error along with a negligible computational time indicates the superiority of the proposed heuristics. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.