Primary Stability/Mobility of 1-Stage and 2-Stage Dental Implants: A Comparative In Vitro Study


Creative Commons License

Gulay G., Asar N. V., Tulunoglu I., Turkyilmaz I., Wang H., Tozum T. F.

IMPLANT DENTISTRY, cilt.21, sa.6, ss.461-466, 2012 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 21 Sayı: 6
  • Basım Tarihi: 2012
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1097/id.0b013e3182661615
  • Dergi Adı: IMPLANT DENTISTRY
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.461-466
  • Anahtar Kelimeler: dental implants, transducers, alveolar bone loss, stability, RESONANCE FREQUENCY-ANALYSIS, INSERTION TORQUE, MANDIBULAR OVERDENTURES, INITIAL STABILITY, FOLLOW-UP, SYSTEMS, MULTICENTER, CAPACITY, DEFECTS
  • Gazi Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Purpose: To evaluate the primary stability of 1-stage (nonsubmerged) and 2-stage (submerged) implants via newest wireless resonance frequency (RF) analyzer and newer wireless mobility measuring (MM) device. Materials and Methods: Six 1-stage dental implants with internal hex connection and six 2-stage dental implants, 4.1 mm in diameter and 11.5 mm in length, were inserted bilaterally into the first premolar, second premolar, and first molar regions of 6 standard mandibular transparent self-curing acrylic resin models. After that, the periimplant circular bone defects were created in millimeter increments ranging between 0 and 5 mm to the same extent on all implants. Results: Implant stability quotient values significantly decreased at 1-stage and 2-stage implants when periimplant defects increased. Similar implant stability quotient values were found for both implant types; however, significantly lower MM values were noted for 2-stage implants. Irrespective of implant systems, the results indicated a significant association between wireless RF analyzer and wireless MM device. Conclusion: Both wireless RF analyzer and wireless MM device were adequate in assessing implant stability. There was no difference between 2-stage and 1-stage implant systems, except lower MM values were noted for nonsubmerged implants. (Implant Dent 2012;21:461–466) Key Words: dental implants, transducers, alveolar bone loss, stability