Impact of different fixed dental prostheses on radiation dose in helical tomotherapy as measured with metal oxide semiconductor field-effect transistor dosimetry


Us S. B., Ataol A. S., ERGÜN G.

ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY, cilt.133, sa.6, ss.716-724, 2022 (SCI-Expanded) identifier identifier identifier

  • Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
  • Cilt numarası: 133 Sayı: 6
  • Basım Tarihi: 2022
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1016/j.oooo.2022.01.007
  • Dergi Adı: ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY
  • Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Scopus, BIOSIS, CAB Abstracts, CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Veterinary Science Database
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.716-724
  • Gazi Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Objective. This ex vivo study evaluated the effects of different fixed dental prostheses and protective materials on scattered radiamonolithic zirconia ceramic; group BZ: bilayer zirconia-based all ceramic; and group BM: bilayer metal-ceramic restorations) were examined in maxillary and mandibular arch phantoms. All groups were divided into 3 subgroups: (1) without protective material over the prostheses; (2) protected with a soft acrylic night guard; and (3) protected with polyvinylsiloxane putty. All groups were irradiated with helical RT at 2 Gy and 6 MV photon energy. Doses were measured internally and externally 3 times on each phantom. Results were significant at P < .05. Results. No statistically significant differences in doses were found between groups NT and BL in either phantom, but these groups were different from the others. The differences between groups BZ and MZ were insignificant. Doses in group BM were significantly larger than all other groups. No significant differences existed between doses with and without protective material. Conclusions. Doses increased significantly due to scattered radiation from the prostheses with increasing material density. Protective materials had no significant effect on dose. (Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2022;133:716-724)