Comparison of Different Fixation Methods for Stabilization in 10 mm Mandibular Advancement Using Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy: A Finite Element Analysis
Selcuk Dental Journal, cilt.12, ss.357-362, 2025 (Scopus, TRDizin)
- Yayın Türü: Makale / Tam Makale
- Cilt numarası: 12
- Basım Tarihi: 2025
- Doi Numarası: 10.15311/selcukdentj.1735752
- Dergi Adı: Selcuk Dental Journal
- Derginin Tarandığı İndeksler: Scopus, Central & Eastern European Academic Source (CEEAS), Directory of Open Access Journals, TR DİZİN (ULAKBİM)
- Sayfa Sayıları: ss.357-362
- Gazi Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet
Özet
BACKGROUND: Sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) is a common orthognathic procedure for mandibular advancements. Proper segment positioning and rigid fixation are crucial for optimal outcomes. Various fixation techniques have been proposed to enhance stability. While most studies focus on 5 mm and 7 mm advancements, larger advancements pose a greater risk of horizontal relapse. Despite this, 10 mm advancements are increasingly performed in oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS). This study evaluates the stability and biomechanical properties of different fixation methods in 10 mm mandibular advancements to determine the most effective technique. METHODS: Eight finite element models were developed, incorporating bicortical screws, monocortical screws, plates, and hybrid fixation techniques. A 140 N vertical force was applied to the first molar, and displacements were analyzed using finite element analysis (FEA). RESULTS: The least displacement was observed with two 4-hole miniplates, while the highest occurred with two upper bicortical screws. Hybrid fixation showed greater stability than single-plate systems. CONCLUSION: The most reliable method for 10 mm advancements is two miniplates at the upper and lower borders. However, hybrid systems supported by a bicortical screw placed at the upper border can also provide sufficient stability.