Optimization of γ-CD-MOFs Prepared Using Different Particle Size Modulators: TEA,CTAB and PEG20000


Creative Commons License

Mutlu Ağardan N. B., Edisan Ş.

European Federation for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Vienna, Avusturya, 19 - 21 Şubat 2025, (Özet Bildiri)

  • Yayın Türü: Bildiri / Özet Bildiri
  • Basıldığı Şehir: Vienna
  • Basıldığı Ülke: Avusturya
  • Gazi Üniversitesi Adresli: Evet

Özet

Cyclodextrin-MOFs have recently attracted attention as an alternative drug delivery system with high porosity, surface area, micro-nano sized particle size, and biocompatibility properties eliminating the toxicity risk of metal ion and organic binder in the structures of conventional MOFs [1].  The aim of this study is to prepare optimized nano sized CD-MOF using cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide (CTA), polyethylene glycol 20000 (PEG20000) and triethylamine (TEA) as particle size modulators [2].

 

Gamma-cyclodextrin metal-organic framework was prepared by modified methanol diffusion method [3]. CTAB, TEA and PEG20000 were used as particle size modulators. CD: particle size modulator weight ratios were used at 0.5, 1.5, 3.5.  Particle size, polydispersity index and zeta potential were measured. When the results were examined, 1.5 was selected for the formulation prepared with PEG20000. The lowest particle size was obtained at this rate. The Pdı value and zeta potential show that a uniform and stable formulation was obtained. In the formulation developed with CTAB, a ratio of 0.5 was selected. This formulation has a better zeta potential than other formulations. The PDI value was found to be the lowest. When TEA was used, the ratio of 3.5 was selected. This is because it was found to be more optimum than other formulations when looking at the pdi value and particle size (Table 1).

 

TEA, CTAB and PEG20000 are particle size modulators used in the literature to prepare CD-MOF. In this study, CD-MOFs were prepared using these three particle size modulators with different molecular weights and chemical properties. For further studies, optimum formulations were selected according to the results obtained in terms of particle size, pdi and zeta potential values.

 

Table 1. Optimization table of formulations

 

CD: Particle size modulator (weight ratio)

Particle size (nm) ±SD

Polydispersity index ±SD

Zeta potential (mV)±SD

PEG20000

0,5

367,5±19,22

0,196±0,053

-14,26±1,68

 

1,5

309,73±98,502

0,306±0,018

-13,86±2,27

 

3,5

327,066±16,536

0,301±0,064

-29±2,1

CTAB

0,5

367,5±14,8

0,236±0,054

-14,933±1,91

 

1,5

504,23±75,407

0,567±0,092

-6,24±1,15

 

3,5

306,2±53,43

0,287±0,153

-6,02±1,7

TEA

0,5

340,8±36,541

0,825±0,096

-16,66±2,205

 

1,5

786,26±58,48

0,475±0,127

-22,83±4,37

 

3,5

574,33±240,6

0,633±0,186

-12,93±1,66